Post

They are not reconsidering this legislation that will be extremely damaging to a huge number of PPL, no, they are 'giving' 'rebels' 'concessions', ie reducing the level of harm they intend to inflict by the minimum possible level, in order for the Westminster machine to continue to function for them

It's good, but he should never have put himself in this position in the first place. He needs to be more thoughtful and organised when making changes, especially of this magnitude.

Hold on,why are we not discussing Starmers support of the illegal bombing in Iran. I mean its a fact its illegal,and its a fact Starmer supported it. Why has he not said anything about the illegal bombing

Never underestimate how supine Labour's rightist MPs in their vast majority can prove. One rebel claims "massive" climbdowns. Others cite "significant" concessions. No Commons member from the red Tories should vote for any benefit cuts. Any who does so must face ejection at the next election.

Why not ask the current govt and make it viral to recall billions from offshore havens that were taken away during covid etc? Arent there real lawyers in the current govt? At least 3 sitting on the front bench. The minimum that could be gotten back is £500 billion!!

If Mr Starmer does not remember immediately that he is labour and not conservative, reform UK will have twice as many MP's during the next general election. There is absolutely no difference between Starmer and Johnson. What is that guy doing in the labour party.

starmer stubbornly insists on his neoliberal agenda even when, after the 2008 crisis, neoliberalism is dead

The real solution is to completely vote it down to force it to be done all over again and, if need be, again until there is a meaningful outcome and nobody in need has to be deprived which they will be if Starmer and Reeves get their way.

*'Massive bribes'