Post

Crista 🔶
@tagide.com

Was this study performed and written by ChatGPT itself? Just poking at it for 20 minutes: 1) Table 3, the entry for Bašić et al. (2023a) says n=12. That paper used n=9 2) Almohesh (2024) used the "Chat GBT" (?), different learning methods, gamification, should have been excluded

nature.comnature.com
Nicole Hennig@nic221.bsky.social

The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04787-y #AI #education

4 reposts7 likes

Kevin Solez
@kevinsolez.bsky.social

I read the abstract and was certainly discouraged. They qualify "proper use" of the tool, but this extreme reserve and restraint students must use to ethically use it is not intuitive or easily taught. My sense is that the study is not worth while.

Crista 🔶
@tagide.com

I've seen enough. The paper in question is this one: www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comThe effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis - Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsHumanities and Social Sciences Communications - The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis