Post

If you have lived life in republic where people voting to touch the stove has never had profound, understood negative material impact because it was managed away – something was already broken and someway possibly inevitable. Break the feedback loop of a market or idea, you eventually break it all.

41 reposts323 likes

There have been plenty of godawful Mayors and Governors: thieves, idiots, ideologues, incompetents. But voters rarely rate candidates for their managerial skills, and then vote accordingly.

This is such an important facet of a much larger idea but it is so misunderstood on its own I might just delete this. Resentment of a "deep state" is downstream of legislature that rules by omnibus bill with no votes for ideas or policy. Leaving a state trying to continue in absence of a pillar.

As I have said long time, the court really did take over the job of social issue response with pressure relief votes as legislature deferred. Executive agencies really did take over the job of creating legislation as the legislature became evermore calcified. Everything is the legislature breaking.

The thing with criticism of the court and executive exercising undue powers... is they are some degree vulnerable to it. But they were sort of forced into this position as the legislature absconded its responsibility to represent the people and their interests. It all just really sucks really bad

I don't know if people are in an information vacuum or are they strategically don't acknowledge it, but there is like a lot of very iffy executive actions and constructed court precedents that built your world and you like me probably like. But that was something the legislature was supposed to do.

I’ve been noodling expanding the house dramatically and changing the senates role from “has to pass an identical bill” to “can pass amendments that have to get an up or down vote in the house”.

I think it’s all downstream of complexity that defies common/typical understanding. Whether regulation happens as an executive function or a legislative one, it’s still piling complexity on top of complexity. You end up in the same place.

We settled on an interpretative regime because it’s impossible for a legislative body to consider all the details of every iteration of every possible downstream effect of the implementation of its intent. Legal precedent and the regulatory development process are outgrowths of that impossibility.

Good summary, the system wasn’t designed to withstand one branch just giving up. IMO gerrymandering is the critical element in the legislature breaking. No deals at home, no deals in DC. Fixing the legislature will require re-establishing logical voting district boundaries.

I remember reading a theory article making the case that "pork barrel" and "they're all corrupt" normalization played a major part in freezing the legislature. If everything is corruption and pork barrels you can't negotiate giving a defense contrast to one state in return for more medicare budget

Instead of a litany of little agreements and give-and-take we get hardliners elected under the promise they won't let anything slip by them. And if they ever compromise to win a different game they're also playing? Well, see the blowback AOC gets when she compromises even a little.

And for Republicans that’s a feature, not a bug. One example of this is GenZ growing up having no faith in government because they never seen successful a legislature in their lifetime. Disenchanted young people works to the Republicans’ advantage.

Right, the filibuster is a huge vector of causation here. If political parties with majorities can’t govern or legislate, someone else will! I mean, say what you will about state legislatures, you can see the will of the people (sometimes it’s really shitty) enacted at the state level

Having a party that is just a grab bag of every piece of resentment and paranoia this country has ever had since its founding while having a system designed to make it very easy for a minority party to gum everything up seems like a bad recipe.

Filibuster turns out breaks a democracy. Unable to do anything without 75% support *except* cut taxes via budget reconciliation, your government is paralyzed. Previously you could bribe senators to break ranks using earmarks; that was killed, and laws became impossible to pass.