Post
Given the non-deterministic nature of LLMs, maybe sheep dogs are a better analogy than a table saw! bsky.app/profile/simo...
That's entirely true: they are non-deterministic, which means you have to learn how to use them in a way that takes that into account Sheepdogs are non-deterministic too, they're still invaluable tools for someone who learns how to work with them
12 reposts118 likes
Love this observation: that table saw analogy really is an ink blot test for people's opinions of LLMs bsky.app/profile/yayp...
I went to your profile and read and re-read that table saw comment, and one can come away with several different interpretations! It's kind of like an ink blot test for one's thoughts about LLMs
I spent more than an hour strategizing and designing with Claude today. It was great and reminded me of having a couple of young programmers and a whiteboard. I imagined asking them how long to implement. Claude did it in ten minutes. I spent another half hour refining. Orders of magnitude for sure.
I just spent a few nights writing up my approach to trying to introduce some form of determinism to LLM-assisted coding workflows. Not a one size fits all of course. Would be interested in your thoughts. mariozechner.at/posts/2025-0...