Post

It's a big field, everything is moving so quickly, and there's a race to dominance. So while $ is flowing, size isn't as big of an issue. There's decades of optimization to be found, and it will be, but it's not the largest priority at the moment.

agree on the impact but at the speed it’s going it’s hard to know all the impacts. AI seem like a catch all right now. Sometimes it seems like the automation of administrative tasks - lawyers finding precedence cases from a massive database, other times seems like it’s much more sophisticated ?

I'd say it's actually impossible to keep track of all the impacts. I get daily update emails, each with too much data to inspect or keep track of. Because of the rapid growth, even our language will have a hard time keeping up. Best I've come up for AI is: Yes, but also or Yes, but not yet.

Dominance in what way. Can you achieve that when everything moves so fast? Managing that also becomes very difficult when you have no idea when what you’re doing will be obsolete? Crazy times

Dominance in the way that the industrial revolution laid the infrastructure for the 1st -3rd worlds. This revolution seems like it will have nearly the same impact on humanity. To your question about speed the answer is no, which is why everyone is moving so quickly. Finally, totally agree: CRAZY

Models other than R1 have been great at coding for a couple of years now DeepSeek really did come up with a bunch of new tricks that other labs hadn't tried yet - they deserve a lot of respect for that, especially given the detail with which they described that work in the papers they published

I don't think saying "x are much smarter" is a useful way to frame this - the modern AI space has brilliant contributions from all over the world, it's one of the things I like about it It did definitely just get a lot cheaper to train good models, which is excellent news

Interesting, I tried having it put together some value files for Helm to use in my home lab but it just kept hallucinating. Wonder where the line between configuration and coding is for LLMs

Thanks. I've been trying to work out what Deepseek will be useful for. I'd been using Llama3 for structured data extraction when RegEx fails. In my testing I've found Llama3 8B to be about 5 times faster than Deepseek-R1 7B. Potentially a lot of GPU whirring so obviously not what Deepseek is for.

Interesting to see potential for the model to talk itself out of updating code when reasoning "But I'm still a bit confused about how to handle this comprehensively. Maybe looking at examples would help, but since the user is asking for code, perhaps writing pseudo-code first could guide me better."

This has been my experience with it so far too. The thinking is really good at noticing little things that most models would just ignore or take for granted.

Dumb q: Why are there multiple huggingface options for the same model but with vastly different download sizes? What's the catch with the 16GB option? Thanks in advance!

It's not terrifically complex or sophisticated – but it'll optimize the slow part of an important microservice here. I'm waiting for one of our Rustaceans to chime in on that PR, but the Rust code looks OK to me!

It replaces the `jsonmerge` pure-Python package with a Rust implementation that hard-codes the custom merge strategy we use – making it about 13x faster. Now we can code up an MVP quickly in Python and then let the AI rewrite the core for speed in Rust once our requirements and API are stable!

Whoops – didn't realize it'd been linked in the PyPI metadata. I'll ask my corporate masters to make it public ツ The code is still in a pull request, so the repo will look empty at first anyway...

It is fantastic, and you can now even run your own GenAI models on a modest Windows 10 laptop. Trump foolish to restrict AI access to China. Their reaction is to catch up and now world lead GenAI by using different and more efficient techniques.

It might have some language blindspots though. My colleague was experimenting with it and ran into some Java date/time confusion (that 4o had no trouble with). And he had trouble getting it to generate Clojure code at all. Maybe more narrowly focused training data?