Post

The reason I think it's important to spread the message that using modern AI tools is difficult is that I don't want people being embarrassed to ask questions about how to use them - or quietly assuming they "aren't smart enough" and giving up

Simon Willison@simonwillison.net

General consensus in the replies and quotes of this seems to be that the entire concept of "AI skills" is a joke - how hard is typing text into a chatbot, really? I will continue to argue that it's genuinely difficult, and that the challenge in using these tools is widely underestimated

Oh man, I remember Reddit writhing in scorn when the term “prompt engineering” took off. The assumption was that it’s so trivially easy there was no need to overcomplicate it. Fast forward to now, when Anthropic Console will burn 60 seconds optimizing a CoT prompt for you.

To be fair, the complaint was you won’t end up with a ‘prompt engineering’ role. Which is true. Engineers are expected to learn how to engineer prompts, you don’t go hiring for someone to do this exclusively.

I think we are in the early days yet. We don't know how specialized LLMs may become. A sufficiently specialized LLM in the future may well trade features like constraints on prompting for more deterministic or correct output. The analogy today is database query engineers.

I think prompt engineering was corrupted to mean "being good at prompting", which is clearly more a skill than a speciality But meanwhile the term "AI engineer" started to establish itself, which is the specialty of knowing how to build systems on top of this stuff - way more than just prompting

I think "AI Engineer" will prove to be too broad a title to be meaningful. It could be anything from implementing neural nets in code or silicon to training, inference, or fine-tuning. It could be the AI equivalent of search, or NLP, or image processing, or decision analysis, or programming.

I disagree - a if you're training neural nets you're a machine learning engineer or a data scientist. "AI Engineer" has mostly established itself already as practitioners - using the models, not training them.

0 reposts2 likes

I think the lines between the terms "machine learning" and "AI" remain pretty gray, having seen many machine learning academics rebrand their work as AI to ride the hype train (and these are alums of MIT's AI lab!). We will see how the branding settles down. Data scientist is something different.