Post

A door one opened swings in both directions: If you criminalize 'science' then it only takes a re-engineering of 'The Academy' in order to redefine what the 'accepted science' is; and once that basis changes, criminalize those the new Academy doesn't like. Need I say the word, 'paracetamol', here?

Just watched for s second time. You say here & elsewhere that "we know the solutions". However there's hard research from geophysicists doubting ability to replicate the 'service' of fossil fuels with green tech. due to limited mineral resources. Does that mean that you are propagating falsehoods?

Also, beyond the minerals issue, given 10% of the global population are responsible for half of lifestyle emissions, why do you not focus on reducing affluence and thus inequality as solution? (my long-term research project). Another misdirection in terms of possible 'solutions' on your part?