Post

I see that @societyofauthors.bsky.social have spoken and… : 1. They fundamentally confused transparency with what authors want. Transparency does not prevent harm. 2. They contradict themselves about “harm” in the space of a few lines. 3. “Where viable alternatives exists”. Wtf?

4. They're treating it as a problem that can be mitigated downstream. Again… wtf? 5. This isn’t just about copyright. 6. They’re providing a mechanism to legitimise to is whole mess.