Post

I've been posting it in various phrasing of this for a long time: One of America's fundamental mistakes is that it grew to conflate capitalism with a system of government.

No quibbles with the highlighted passages, but the voting process does act sometimes fail, and can actually be improved. It’s going to be a marginal improvement, but sometimes tiny margins lead to huge differences in outcomes.

This is not in conflict with the claims in the passage. What the passage rejects is: tinkering with voting systems, even where failing, will secure liberty. The question isn’t whether “vote harder” occasionally helps, but whether it is sufficient to solve the morass we were/are in, in part or whole.

I speak not of "vote harder"; that's one of the civic virtues under discussion. I mean reforms like more spoiler-resistant methods than plurality or the two-round system, that let people more safely express their honest desire. Even multimember districts to weaken the power of gerrymandering.

Fair enough, and I wasn’t attempting to be dismissive. Word count. I think those things can help tinker around the margins, sure. However, in my 45 years I have watched many promises that such reforms will allow democracy to heal. I have also seen them get immediately undermined as Wills predicted.