Post

Why doesn't React have slots?

I would argue that React already has slots with a different syntax via component props. It's not a perfectly ideal syntax, but, arguably, it's better than the string-matching chaos of web components. After all, I can write <ProfileCardRaw name="BellCube" description={<p>A very cool person!</p>} />

Imo <ProfileCardRaw description={<p>A very cool person!</p>}/> (especially if there are more props/render props!) is a lot harder to read/parse than <ProfileCardRaw> <p slot="description">A very cool person!</p> </ProfileCardRaw> This is an opinion, other peoples opinions may differ.

perhaps, I think that's only really true if you have one or few props. when you have many, it's nicer to more quickly see slots imo. but for slots, I'd do this syntax:

(counter to an earlier point I made) I think the platform kinda messed up on the syntax of slots, and the above is way better than: <arbitrary-element slot="whatever"> additionally, many slots don't even need or want a host element (p in your example).

Respectfully disagree, I think the platforms implementation of slots is fine

that's fine. But how do you explain the goofy semantics of the arbitrary `<p>` tag?

Why is an element required? What if i don't want an arbitrary element wrapping the slot? 🤔

I dunno what to tell you man I just don't think thats a huge problem

🤷 I think it's great that different people care about different things. Would be overwhelming if everyone cared about everything. Like, I would crumble if I cared about the same things you did while also having my current work load

You have an element wrapping the content in your proposed JSX syntax, it's just not a DOM element, it's a JSX thing. Elements are containers for other nodes. Especially with `display: contents`, it's really not bad to use a container when you need to group nodes.

well, I don't like that aspect of JSX either. haha like, <> </> is sorta what I want for non-element-wrapped content but 🤷 I guess maybe what I'm trying to figure if this is what I'm getting at: "need to group" *can* be subjective, I guess