Post

A few people are upset that I indicated I can identify AI and I actually don't believe I can identify AI text. But I can identify weird obsequious and incompetent pitches that have 5+ paragraphs of words that say nothing and somehow get the details wrong about a book they swear they loved.

The reason I said we can recognize THESE pitches is because we all got roughly zero of these a few years ago and now we get dozens a day and they all sound identical and most are word vomit and are describing our books to us with incorrect details.

They also just...summarize the book akin to a goodreads summary *despite speaking to the author who obviously knows all this*. Like yeah, no shit Dance of Chaos is about an assassin named Haern, I wrote it. It so obviously reeks false, and is painful to read.

in fairness, if I were ever to cold-email an author and was saying I'd loved their work, I'd want to include some kind of proof that I had, in fact, read their work. However I suspect I'd be able to do better than "an LLM read the title and maybe the goodreads summary" levels

There is never a need to prove you read the work when emailing someone to simply say you enjoyed their work. It isn't necessary, nor does it ever happen. That said, we can tell the difference. It's obvious. Painfully obvious.