Post

Shitty access journo-pundits: "I HaVe To ReTuRn To TwItTer To UnDeRsTanD wHat'S GoIng On" What's going on:

I'm sorry, as a scoop-oriented access journalist I simply have no choice but to use a social media platform owned by a fascist oligarch who is literally and indisputably killing millions of people across multiple overlapping arenas

independent.co.ukElon Musk has just shown why Trump and the US are now the enemy withinTrump’s moves against Ukraine – including a diesel deal with Putin and a row over restricting Starlink – mean he must now be seen as a hostile force in Europe, explains world affairs editor Sam Kiley

prominent tech pundits could help journalists build alternative communications platforms free of fascist-coddling billionaire algorithmic influence but they might miss out on lazy boosterism by people completely disinterested in having honest conversations about the real-world impact of AI

We already have alternatw platforms. The problem is that the tech elite have made people (rightfully) skeptical of concregating on a new shared platform. Consumers don't want a new Facebook or Twitter and there's no incentive to code an app that won't get used.

If he HAS TO GO, let him leave. bsky.app/profile/case...

Casey Newton@caseynewton.bsky.social

X seems to be experiencing a kind of 'reverse eternal September' where the user base thins out, making it feel more like a clubhouse. (Hopefully it will continue to thin out! But in the meantime this may explain why some are slinking back) www.platformer.news/x-reverse-et...

sometimes. Sometimes it's not even interesting enough to qualify as unethical. It's just soggy platitudes.