Post

well resourced paper Op/Ed sections should could be an amazing space to platform strange, wonderful, and intelligent ideas by artists, activists, scientists, and scholars you've never heard of instead the dull, conservative extraction class converted the whole segment into a contrarian troll farm

Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social

Did Knee-Jerk Contrarianism Ruin the New York Times?

77 reposts492 likes

women are forever just what is useful to society and their actual lives are seen as whatever. Someone is going to say this is everyone under capitalism or something. But no, I really do mean women. Now they have decided what is useful is women shouldn't work apparently.

and then there's The Hill, which converted its Op/Ed pages into a lazy shithole where shitty people with undisclosed financial conflicts of interests provide false gravitas for unpopular, usually anti-democratic ideas

I used to work in comms for an environmental research institute and would pitch editorials to NYT and we would almost never get published because it’s so competitive. And then they use their real estate for this absolute fucking garbage….

I have 25 years of writing experience about consumer rights and corporate power and could write absolute bangers for them, but they'd never publish me because sometimes I say fuck on the internet (and I grew up poor)