Post

just dont

I'm so torn. Brutal Legend is one of only 3 RTSes I ever had fun with, but trying to make a sequel without the Kill Master and Guardian of Metal? That just feels wrong.

Yeah, the Indigo Girls were right there.

I like the rts as well but only after I understood the weird design choice of hiding character progression after finding those damn statues, after doing that I could beat the glam metal squad and proceed to finish the game

Oh a 3D adventure game with RPG mechanics would've been fire I feel I could honestly say "You know how the game is for the first few minutes, before you encounter the open world or RTS stuff? Just make it like that the whole way through" and it would be an all timer

It doesn't help that the devs wants to focus on the RTS and EA handled the advertising... and entirely failed to mention the online RTS aspects that the devs wanted to be the main feature

I'd just wish for a different genre of game...it felt bad seeing a game that appeared like a hack & slash/action-adventure game actually be an RTS.

lol back to begging!

careful, its just them teasing and have no intentions of making the second game sadly. they have other games in mind they wanna make.

Well, it could be worse. I did give money to Chris Roberts to make "Squadron 42".

I'm not going to give Tim Schaeffer a SINGLE CENT for him to mismanage to shit.

The stretch goal is over 250x the actual funding goal. It's obviously tongue-in-cheek - so of course IGN tweets it out like it's "news".

I mean as in likenesses, voices, ect.

fair. the music licensing alone has to be brutal

I rather prefer a remake without tower defence mechanics and a more Zelda-like adventure... like the first hours in the original.

Anyone that had an Xbox knew they came out, they were on gamepass land both games had home screen ads. Also both games were beyond mid and served no audience. I played both of them, and anyone else who did,can see why MS dropped them. This kickstarter is a grift and it’s dishonest.