Post

there's a few lines in here about reading papers that go, approximately, 'it is not about reading the paper, it's about being exposed to the core idea and then thinking alongside the paper; ideally you try to prove it to yourself and use the paper to check your work' and it's like my favorite idea!

jae (hallowed)@fubarchitect.com

oh i like this one a lot, especially @3blue1brown.com 's commentary on credit and ownership and, approximately, meaning-making it resonates with a central conflict i have with society; y'all way too into 'status' and 'credit' and it's a wonder anything useful ever gets done in that context

this is what gaming is like for me; i see a game mechanic and a part of my brain cracks open; i am curious how it was done but have negative desire to see the code, i want to reason to how it """should be""" done in my internal code ideology before i consider how it actually is done

using saas as well; in general for the applied mathematics schools i understand, a real world artifact is a paper for this model of thought and they make me tremendously happy

anyway, this is becoming how software discussion works as well! "hey guys, i just summoned <tool>" - i don't actually want to see <tool> yet. i want to think about if your version of <tool> sounds useful, and will likely end up summoning a very different [tool] later

0 reposts0 likes

No replies yet.