Post

> sick of the robots on the street sharing our space, we didnt consent to that brother you have consent completely fucked up, you cannot consent on behalf of the street dawg

"we didn't consent to" is a 99.9% efficient indicator of an absolute dogshit perspective inbound, just full disconnect from reality, because imagining communal consent to the actions of others requires this

What on earth are you talking about? Nobody asked for Google to spy on its users so egregiously that legislation had to be drawn up to get them to seek “permission”, which they then strongarmed publishers into gaining via cookie banners. *Obviously* some PM asked for that… but so what?!

igi, because often there is an underlying user-ask. google spying lubricates all sorts of "the computer should just know" features that people like-to-claim-to-hate-while-using-them but i think more clearly "no one asked" papers over thinking about why a PM thought this was smart

if you mentally delete "no one asked for this" from one's polemic toolbox and replace it with "why would this ever happen" the latter basically always has an answer that if internalized makes your protest more effective. "why did google spy on us?" - to make ads """better""". that leads to more whys

"No one asked for cookies" meanwhile you see people complaining about paywalls every day. Well, that's why ads exist and once ads exist the buyers want to know who they are advertising to. This is all the result of preferences people state out loud all the time! And most things are like that.

yeah no one who doesn't rack boxes or pay aws bills really thinks at all about how fucking expensive the internet will be when it no longer does all the shit-they-hate

i'm all in personally; charge me for my ad-supported shit. gimme the ability to pay you a dime not to see ads on this page only. let me subscribe to the desurveilled web but i don't think most users actually are

0 reposts4 likes

No replies yet.