Post

this is the really ineffective head-in-the-sand reaction a lot of folks on Bluesky tend to have if you talk about any harm reduction-based approach to the reality that millions of people are using AI tools today. The current approach to critiquing AI is obviously not working, but they don't care.

Been debating writing my "AI is not going away" article about why people reacting with the "shut it all down" response are making it more difficult for people who want to build better user-empowering AI tools

People just know that "build[ing] better user-empowering AI tools" is just horseshit. That's not what's going to happen and everyone knows it. You guys keep acting like it's impossible to get rid of dangerous technology that hurts people, but we've done it before or you'd be brushing with radium.

I don’t keep acting like that, I’m literally arguing for tactics that are *more* likely to achieve that goal. Bluesky did not get adoption by going on Twitter & shitting on people. Ghost & Buttondown are not getting adoption by telling Substack users they’re scumbags. Engaging with users is *good*.

But you aren't trying to get rid of it. Instead you're promising a non-dangerous version and that doesn't exist. You are putting a sugar coating on a poison pill. No one's saying you have to go yell at AI bros, but you're actively supporting it, and that's different.

that hasn't actually happened tho. radium is still used for radiography, we just don't wear it anymore. lead is the center of a thriving industry, but not for housepaint. asbestos is in fucking microwaves. similarly, llms will continue to power IDEs even if chatgpt is axed

we live in exactly the world you claim isn't real; where shit doesn't actually go away, we just reduce the harm caused by improving containment and finding new usecases

“Improve containment” is a vague euphemism. What you mean is government regulation. And government regulation of AI is not going to happen without a massive amount of effort here; presently it seems essentially impossible.

I think what I'd like to see personally is just criminal liability as a starting point, but criminal liability that operates in a serious way and isn't adjudicated as fines. even that sucks because relevant corporations will just assign sacrificial lambs, but it's something?