Post

2/ Starting strong by positioning ending the war as a choice for Europe to make. Putin just wanted a 'sensible security pact', that's why he enshrined Russian ownership of four regions of Ukraine into the Russian constitution and tried to take Kyiv. Just a smol, sensible bean.

3/ So much to unpack here. First, the 'forever war' in this case is entirely Putin's choice. He could declare 'victory' or 'mission accomplished' or nothing at all and just withdraw to Russia's borders at literally any time. Macron isn't dragooning Russian troops into attacks on Kherson.

4/ The sanctions bit of this is also very dumb. It assumes Europeans thought sanctions would, for pretty much the first time in human history, topple a regime. Not signal opposition (which they did) Not slow down Russia's economy (which they did) Not starve Russia's warmachine (which they did).

29 reposts546 likes

5/ Yeah dude, Russia's economy is going great guns. They're crushing it. This is the kind of economic inisght and analysis that made Yanis such an invaluable asset to Greece. Is monthly inflation of 6% and a 15% interest rate good, Yanis? Military Keynsianism lmao.

6/ The strategy has been give Ukraine support so it can keep killing Russians until the price becomes unsustainable. It's not a perfect plan, and it's one both Europe and the US have been interrmitent on executing, but it's clearly working. Don't take my word for it, read Russian mil-bloggers.

7/ *"What the fuck are you talking about, Jesse?" meme* So a (US created) energy crisis in April of 2026 will compel the EU to abandon Ukraine and accept a peace deal that will see US owned pipelines that won't be finished for years eventually sell it Russian gas? Are you fucking high buddy?

8/ Every analyst who actually knows what they're talking about has been clear that while higher oil/gas prices as a result of the Strait crisis offer a reprieve for Russia, they don't solve any of their problems. It's a bandaid, not a prosthetic. Also, Ukrainian drones are working on it 😘.

in fact the Ukrainian counter offensive is doing well and Ukraine is now killing Russians faster than Putin can recruit. Morale in Russian side is collapsing and internet ban suggests things far from rosy on Russian side. Ukraine has a much better chance of winning now than previously.

Aside from such vanity seeming slightly more incongruous on the left, isn't it equally common across the political spectrum? It isn't hard to think of self-adoring individuals from left, right and centre.

That much was crystal clear with his stupid little Paris Match photoshoot. Not to pat myself on the back, but I correctly appraised him as a self-promoting idiot as soon as he appeared.

"Military Keynesianism" is when you pay people to dig useless holes, except this time the vatniks stay in the holes forever

I heard some intel on these econ benefits of war machine: apparently the gov stimulus was front-loaded with 90% of payments to companies to produce for military up front with 10% on contract completion: hence juiced economy early in war and no sustained boom.

Does he think that literally all military spending in Ukraine is going to buying weapons from the US and other NATO countries? That seems bizarre and out of touch with reality although I guess that fits with the rest of his essay. Also, what is a left-winger doing writing for Unheard?!?

As always, fascism is not responsible for the things its actual leaders say whereas opponents of fascism have to justify the most extreme position anyone on social media with vaguely aligned vibes took.

Well, to be fair, the sanctions were sold to Europeans in part as a way to force Putin to capitulate or face a potential coup. There were a lot of sceptical voices, too. In any case, it diminishes Russia's ability to wage war.

You have to hand it to the guy - Trump attacking Iran is like sanctions - NOT like Putin attacking Ukraine. It takes a special kind of ethical and intellectual bankruptcy to nail that one.