Post

A @tanstack.com start design question ( @tannerlinsley.com @tkdodo.eu ) Why do you have to THROW a redirect instead of (early) returning it? tanstack.com/start/latest... Throw is commonly supposed to handle an erroneous situation. Redirect doesn't seem like one. TIA for response!

Well for one it doesn't mess with the types. So you can return some data from the server function and if you want to, throw the user to login but the types will only show the data your returning.

I understand I "can" do lots of things within a specific API design. But redirect seems a really normal result. Throwing is commonly used for abnormal interruption. Not to mention that SE in general is slightly moving away from exceptions, mostly, due to overhead due to building stack traces.

I mean redirects are as normal as throwing errors. I don't see the problem with not returning them. I have very rarely had an endpoint that would redirect, but your mileage may vary. And I don't think you're going to feel the perf impact of throwing instead of returning 😅

Redirect is not an error. Nothing to add from my side...

Yeah, it's not an error. I said the flow is similar. And I'm OK with the semantics being a bit wrong. So I guess let's agree to disagree 😁