Post
Jackson: "It seems to me that a case involving a court order like the one at issue here—which left the state election rule untouched—does not necessarily fall within the ambit of Purcell and its concern about federal courts “changing the election rules” at the last minute."
19 reposts79 likes
Jackson: "I respectfully dissent because—even, and perhaps especially, when an election is looming—I would not disturb a clearly justifiable federal-court order issued to ensure that the public receives accurate information about a State’s electoral processes." Full story: demdock.com/4z0b3gZ
demdock.comSupreme Court lets New Hampshire fully ban student IDs for voting ahead of midtermsJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson stressed that the lower court’s order did not rewrite New Hampshire law but sought to stop state officials from misleading voters about what the law permits.