Post

Statements from Dems like this one make it harder to press for Supreme Court reform. This ruling was a near-disaster and shows how unhinged SCOTUS has become—now just one vote away from overturning the 14th Amendment. But a sitting senator says they "applaud" the ruling.

And here's a similar one from the DNC. SCOTUS didn't "emphatically reject" the anti-birthright arguments. It barely did, by the skin of its teeth.

I read ~20 press releases from Dems & progressive groups that hit my inbox on the birthright ruling. They all sound exactly like those shared above. "Applauding," SCOTUS "reaffirms," "victory for rule of law," etc. Not one warns how close this was to a loss, or makes the case for SCOTUS reform.

Here's a better one, but for those who care about democracy, this case needs to be used as a jumping-off point to make the argument for SCOTUS reform.

23 reposts145 likes

I'm sharing this one, too, because it's not just moderate Dems missing the moment here. Folks are taking a victory lap or breathing a sigh of relief when it's a five-alarm fire.

Better, but still needs to be tied to calls for SCOTUS reform

Matt Szafranski@mszafranski.bsky.social

It seems @massago.bsky.social is the first that puts out a statement noting how frightfully close the decision was.

I'm not criticizing these responses to dunk on Dems. I'm saying that powerful people utterly misunderstand the moment and are missing a critical opportunity to make the case for SCOTUS reform. I even wonder whether they understand the need for it.

Hakeem Jeffries@hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social

Birthright citizenship remains the law of the land. Out of many, one!

This is the best response to this decision I've seen so far from a sitting member of Congress.

Chris Murphy@chrismurphyct.bsky.social

Just shocking this was a 5-4 ruling. This Court is so so badly broken.

I think that they spent a ton of effort from 2014 to 2024 to convey that the Supeme Court was vitally important and it did nothing for them electorally. I would not be shocked if they thought they should stop running in it.

Problem is not the designed structure of the Supreme Co, but the current makeup of SCOTUS. Most members represent popular ideas from 18th & 19th centuries about presidential executive authority, women's place in society, government's role as social support, & white superiority. The world has grown.

I think the people who swear up and down that they want a strong Republican Party and blame the senate parliamentarian when they renege on their campaign promises don’t actually want a manifestly different court