Post
One concern I have is, will people start to use this as a means of “explaining” or rationalizing downloads of projects. Who ends up invigilating what an “anomaly” is considered and could that extend to classifying fair or unfair downloads? Does this leave room for litigious banter. That’ll be tricky
At minimum clear documentation and a definition of an anomaly needs to be written and clearly visible. A process for redacting or questioning recorded anomalies might be good. An official statement of who invigilates the submissions and accepts them. Perhaps two-party review mechanism. 👍
0 reposts2 likes
No replies yet.