Post

They're referring to the IP violation. It's still not really a meaningful article, because it's pretty clear cut copyright infringement, they just have to litigate. Obviously that's reactionary, and so the IP violation had to happen before the lawsuit response.....

Yes agreed but as you’re suggesting not a single person in media circles questions this. If there’s a IP infringement boom they’ll get sued and they’re licking their chops to do it. Meanwhile every other thing involving AI is an argument and freakout daily.

Yeah, pretty fair point. I guess I've grown tired/dismissive of Bloomberg AI posts, but it does show the pulse of where general media opinion is at any given time =P