I'm ready to accept a definition of "agent" that I think is widely-enough agreed upon to be useful, at least in the AI engineering space: An LLM agent runs tools in a loop to achieve a goal (I've been dismissing the term as hopelessly ambiguous for years) simonwillison.net/2025/Sep/18/...
Post
simonwillison.netI think “agent” may finally have a widely enough agreed upon definition to be useful jargon nowI’ve noticed something interesting over the past few weeks: I’ve started using the term “agent” in conversations where I don’t feel the need to then define it, roll my eyes …
I care because I like to have productive conversations where everyone understands what the other person is talking about I wrote a bunch more about this in my post simonwillison.net/2025/Sep/18/...
simonwillison.netI think “agent” may finally have a widely enough agreed upon definition to be useful jargon nowI’ve noticed something interesting over the past few weeks: I’ve started using the term “agent” in conversations where I don’t feel the need to then define it, roll my eyes …
"AI daemon" would be just fine "LLM service" That doesn't cleanly cover local agents like in Claude etc but it covers a vLLM or transformers instance
0 reposts0 likes
No replies yet.