Post

I don’t think there’s a single serious critic who says AI’s not useful? The concerns I see are about content rights, worker impacts, environmental effects, epistemological threats, or media manipulation. But that’s all predicated on the idea that it *does* work, often too well for people to manage…

Kevin Roose@kevinroose.com

The NYT Magazine asked me and @caseynewton.bsky.social to open their AI issue by talking about how we use AI, why it's not going away, and how you can't be a serious critic if you're in denial about how useful it is. Bluesky's gonna love this one! www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/m...

I think it’s unfair to use the word “serious”. The artistic folks (the ones I follow anyway) who want to burn it all down are quite serious folks in their realms. Particularly their criticism of AI “art” is well-taken. I’m not an habitual appreciator of art, but even I can tell how artless AI is. 1/

I understand what *you* want to express by the word, but I can’t imagine that either my “serious” artist friends nor the “serious” “it’s going to be everywhere, change everything” AI boosters are going to take it that way. 2/2

Look, there's a reason people are surfacing a months-old quote out of context. It's not because they're trying to have a reasonable conversation about what I was trying to say. My point was some folks find utility in it, and we have to engage with them on their terms if we're going to change things.

0 reposts0 likes

Sorry about that. As a specialist in the economics of information, I spend a lot of time immersed in the “I know that you think that I believe …” of things, and got triggered.😢 I wish the term “AI” didn’t exist.