Post

I don’t think there’s a single serious critic who says AI’s not useful? The concerns I see are about content rights, worker impacts, environmental effects, epistemological threats, or media manipulation. But that’s all predicated on the idea that it *does* work, often too well for people to manage…

Kevin Roose@kevinroose.com

The NYT Magazine asked me and @caseynewton.bsky.social to open their AI issue by talking about how we use AI, why it's not going away, and how you can't be a serious critic if you're in denial about how useful it is. Bluesky's gonna love this one! www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/m...

I do not think it rots people’s brains to say, “I’ve got these ingredients in my fridge, what could I make from them” and get a recipe. Like, there should be safeguards! But I don’t think autocomplete in our IDEs rotted our brains either.

I agree. And I helped build those features, more than once, on indie food sites. But they don’t have those features now. Because people tend to not seek out individual sites or apps, they’ve been trained to favor generalized interfaces that they’re familiar with.

0 reposts0 likes

Or, that specific use case is actually not that useful. If it was, the previous specialized feature would have been used more often. This hits exactly at the reason the supposed utility doesn't stand up to the massive costs / negative externalities for society.

I’m not saying it’s worth the negative externalities. But that’s a separate point. Like, I don’t think sharing pictures of your dog is worth propping up a company that enables a genocide, but it is true that Instagram lets you share photos. It would be stupid to say “no, it can’t share photos”.