Post

a couple of hours before my keynote, I went through an intense negotiation with the organisers (for over a hour) where we went through my slides and had to remove anything that mentions 'Palestine' 'Israel' and replace 'genocide' with 'war crimes' 1/

and a slide that explains illegal data torrenting by Meta, i also had to remove In the end, it was either remove everything that names names (big tech particularly) and remove logos or cancel my talk. 2/

thankfully @meredithmeredith.bsky.social was also there and joined the conversation casually mentioning how I might interview with the New York Times, which i presumed meant I deliver my keynote (after so many compromises) or they risk cancelling me and blowing the whole thing up 3/

I wish people would do their due diligence on my research and values before inviting me and getting surprised when they discover what I plan to talk about also, immma write about this intense experience

NO. AI. FOR. WAR. CRIMES!!!

on display at the AI for Good Summit in the main hall

genevasolutions.news/science-tech...

A short blogpost detailing my experience of censorship at the AI for Good Summit with links to both original and censored versions of slides and links to my talk aial.ie/blog/2025-ai...

www.codastory.com/disinformati...

last year the UN "ai for good" flagship conference mistreated me and censored my talk because i made the link between the ai industry (their sponsors) and genocide explicit. this year, ITU issues "content guideline" that, on a close read, sounds like a licence to silence criticism of ai/the industry